LISTEN To This Issue.
Give your eyes a rest...
Quote of the Week.
What we REALLY need to re-bootstrap
the tech industry,
is a bold new Killer App!
How Star Trek Has Charted Our Course!
Star Trek may SEEM like sci fi, but I
suggest it's really
DRIVING elements of our future!
MEMS At Work.
Machines at surprisingly tiny sizes
open tremendous opportunities.
Wireless Chips?
Think you know "wireless?" Think
again...
Insights Into The "Email Troubles."
Lessons from recent problems.
From Out of the Ether...
"Competitive Advantage" may take on
new, very personal meanings.
You Know It's Tough When...
Courtroom auctions?
About "The Harrow Technology Report."
LISTEN
To This Issue.
Do you prefer to let your ears
do the work of keeping you in-touch with, and
thinking about where technology is taking us? If
so, "The Harrow Technology Report" is also
available in an audio-on-demand, Web-based, MP3
version.
If you have an MP3 player on
your system (and most do, such as Window's Media
Player, RealPlayer, etc.), clicking on the link
below will either stream the file to you, or,
depending on how your system is configured, it might
download the file before playing it. Alternatively,
if you specifically want to download the file,
simply right-click on the link, and choose "Save
Target As..."
Also, to learn how you can
listen at whatever speed is most comfortable to you,
check out the FAQ at
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/help.htm .
So, if you wish, just click on
the following link to listen to this issue!
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/20021021/20021021.mp3
.
Back to Table of Contents
"[Software improvements are] not as sexy as hardware
improvements. But one thing I have noticed is that
unless there is software that uses the capacity of
that hardware to do interesting things, it sits
idle."
John Robb
President and COO
UserLand Software
www.userland.com
Back
to Table of Contents
Many times in the past, we've discussed my strong
belief that science fiction, even what seems
outrageous at the time, ends up having a profound
effect on scientists' and engineers' thinking, and
so on their work. Although these sci fi readers
'know' that the inventions in these stories aren't
real, I believe that readers (and sci fi movie
goers) who are constantly being exposed to future
possibilities, run a "background task" that keeps
them thinking about how such a device or technique
just MAY be possible. And so they eventually just
figure out how to 'make it so.'
Stephen Hawking admits to being a Trekkie;
roboticists at the famed Palo Alto Research Center (PARC)
said,
"...they had been
motivated to pursue their work in artificial
intelligence and robotics by Star Trek... It's
those stories that get you thinking, 'Wouldn't it be
cool to be one of the people that makes things like
that REALLY possible!'"
And Neil Gershenfeld, Director of the Things That
Think Research Consortium at the equally famed MIT
Media Lab, commented on the,
"...curious
connection between Star Trek and much of the work
being done at the lab... The number of times that
we've realized that we are inventing something here
in the lab from Star Trek is spooky. One
possibility I suppose is that ideas planted by
watching the show are somehow subconsciously guiding
the ideas we pursue..."
Do you see a pattern here? As technology moves
forward, these (and many more) innovative people are
always looking at how to 'make it so.' For example,
consider Motorola's StarTAC cell phone. It was
every Trekkie's dream "toy" because it embodied the
shape, portability, and most of the functionality
(except for acting as a target for transporters -
yet) of Star Trek's famed "Communicator." And so
Motorola just 'made it so.'
Star Trek
Communicator vs. Motorola StarTAC --
Score one for the visionaries!
(In fact, the StarTAC is thinner!)
Special effects courtesy
Jaimie Harrow.
Expanding far beyond this example, "Captain Kirk"
(William Shatner) and sci fi author Chip Walter have
just published a book that squarely addresses how
Star Trek has fueled advances in technology, titled
"Star Trek: I'm Working on That: A Trek from Science
Fiction to Science Fact," ISBN: 067104737X,
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/067104737X/qid=1033043744/sr=
1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-7554898-6395823?v=glance#product-details).
Publisher's Weekly reviews the book on its page on
Amazon.com, where it paints an interesting picture
(excerpts below):
"Shatner bares his
deep-seated trepidation vis-a-vis all things digital
in this breezy peek at the reciprocal effects that
Star Trek (and its offspring), and serious
scientific research, have exerted on one another
over the past 35 years.
While contemplating the Enterprise's fictional warp
drive, [famous scientist] and Trekkie Stephen Hawking
provided the book's title; today's scientists and
inventors are now boldly developing many far-out
concepts that Trekkies earth-wide cherish:
transporters, time travel, wearable interfaceless
computers, artificial
intelligence, androids, enhanced life spans and
holodeck virtual reality. Shatner and Walter
crisscrossed the U.S., visiting cutting-edge
laboratories and noshing with scientists and
inventors on the cusp of discoveries that promise to
change life on earth.
... Shatner valiantly faces the challenge of
demystifying quantum mechanics and black holes,
nanotechnology and the human genome. ... Shatner's
early chapters tend to leave the uninitiated feeling
buffeted by the bitstorm. [However, by] connecting
other abstract concepts, such as the exponential
burgeoning of scientific breakthroughs to such
archetypal Star Trek episodes as "The Trouble with
Tribbles," ... Shatner humanizes his complex topics
and even has some tongue-in-cheek fun with them.
His summary, on the other hand, seriously warns
about letting technological genies out of bottles
without due consideration for consequences and, even
more sobering, for the results of humanity's
ultimate hubris, trying to play God."
This book makes for
some thoughtful reading, especially in light of our
discussions of Ian Pearson's paper at
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20020923/20020923.htm#_Toc20372102
and
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20021007/20021007.htm#_Toc21581179
. Although I'm only half through the book as
I write this, I'm intrigued at both the content and
the way Shatner and Walter provide basic but
understandable insights into some of the most
complex bleeding-edge technologies and breakthroughs
of our time.
(The only things I
didn't like about the book was Shatner referring to
himself as "Bill," and the constantly
self-deprecating style that he used, making no (er)
bones that he considers himself a Luddite. While I
appreciate that this is to support the
clearly-stated caution that this isn't a deep
scientific tome, I mean come on -- we ARE talking
with Captain Kirk here, and It Just Doesn't Seem
Right!)
After you read this, I invite you to recall (or to
begin reading or viewing) the vast number of other
science fiction ("speculative fiction?") works that
are out there, remembering that they may be just the
blueprint for what's yet to come.
Don't
Blink! Because the best sci fi authors are
certainly NOT blinking, as they continue to (subtly
or directly) direct current and future scientists
towards new, "outrageous" goals.

Back to Table of Contents
No, this isn't a misspelled
exposé of that famous Australian band
(http://www.legacyrecordings.com/menatwork/),
nor is the first picture (below) very good (since it
was captured from a live video feed -
(http://mems.sandia.gov/scripts/memscam.asp).
But you might excuse the picture quality when you
realize that the fuzzy objects are a WORKING
gear train (a small gear in the upper-right, meshing
with a much larger gear below it) running on nothing
but electrostatic force, and whose teeth are each
the size of a single red blood cell!!

This comparative
"still" photomicrograph of just the upper "small
gear" makes things all too clear:
(http://mems.sandia.gov/scripts/index.asp)
"Imagine a machine so small that it is imperceptible
to the human eye. Imagine working machines with
gears no bigger than a grain of pollen. Imagine
these machines being batch fabricated tens of
thousands at a time, at a cost of only a few pennies
each. Imagine a realm where the world of design is
turned upside down, and the seemingly impossible
suddenly becomes easy. A place where gravity and
inertia are no longer important, but the effects of
atomic forces and surface science dominate. Welcome
to the microdomain, a world now occupied by an
explosive new technology known as MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical
Systems) or, more simply, micromachines."
Years-old quote from
Sandia National Labs,
http://www.sandia.gov/mstc/technologies/micromachines/vision.html
.
Well, imagine no more! Because as described in a
Sandia National Labs demonstration of their latest
technology, these pictures have captured the soul of
a working "microengine" whose components are so
light (and hence have so little inertia) that they
can spin at over a half-million RPM! (You can watch
it work, LIVE, in the video stream at -
http://mems.sandia.gov/scripts/memscam.asp .)
Oh -- and these gears
have demonstrated an endurance record of over 7
Billion revolutions! (This is the equivalent of
your car engine taking five round trips -- to the
moon.)
Is there a practical
application for this micromotor? Perhaps not yet.
But "yet" is the operative word, since most initial
laboratory prototypes simply prove a point, which
then leads to practical inventions. And considering
that elements of this machine are at the scale of
living human cells, I suspect that the convergence
of NBIC (Nanotechnology, Biology & medicine,
Information sciences, and Cognitive sciences) might
be very interesting, indeed. (For example, I wonder
if doctors might be interested in a machine to
filter blood at the cellular level, or perhaps to
PUMP blood cells around, or...)
Again, Don't Blink!

Back to Table of Contents
Descending even farther down the size scale, you
may have heard of "quantum mirages." And you may
even have seen some of the striking pictures (not
illustrations) that show how a ring of atoms can act
like a cage to contain electrons.

Click
above to enlarge.
Yet you, like I, may not have really appreciated
just why these atomic-scale corrals have scientists
seeing visions of sugarplums, and of far denser and
faster chips, dancing in their heads.
One answer, brought to our attention by reader
Gerard Wenham from the Sept. 3 PC Magazine
(http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,439132,00.asp),
is that because of the properties of
ellipses, which always contains two "foci," any
vibration at one focus is redirected to the second
focus with little loss (think "Statuary Hall" in the
U.S. Capital, where someone whispering at one focus
of the elliptical room can be overheard by someone
standing at the other focus -- early political
espionage, I suspect).
In a similar manner, innovative thinkers at IBM
Research now believe that this "wireless"
transmission of information at the atomic level
(between two foci of an elliptical cage) might
eventually enable them to bypass the wires currently
needed to carry signals within a chip! (Even the
tiniest wires are becoming too big in the face of
Moore's Law's shrinking of transistors.)
"With today's
silicon chips, the tiny wires that carry information
between transistors must be separated, so they don't
overheat and short. As chips get smaller and faster,
keeping the wires apart becomes nearly impossible.
With Quantum Mirage, chips can be significantly
smaller and denser, because the system can send data
without wires."
Which is a rather unique application of
"wireless." And that is more than a little cool.
Check out
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html
for additional pictures of quantum mirages,
plus
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/wwwr_thinkresearch.
nsf/pages/quantum100.html
and
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-
8&oe=UTF-8&q=quantum+mirage
for additional details.
Back to Table of Contents
For the past three issues, you've been treated to
either more than you want or less than you want of
"The Harrow Technology Report," and/or you've
received a BOGUS v-i-r-u-s alert that appeared to
come from this source. Although occurring one after
the other and generating VAST frustration to both
you and to me, my Email provider believes (hopes!!)
that this is now behind us. So I believe a brief
explanation is in order both to set things straight,
and to highlight just how fragile our wonderful
global Internet and its Email system actually is
(and that's not unusual for a complex system that
grew organically without any guidelines.)
1)
The first event (three issues ago, when you
received four to five copies of the issue), was due
to a disk that ran out of sufficient space to hold
the temporary work files for the Emailing process.
This was a condition that an element in the mailing
program didn't check for.
Disk space will no
longer be an issue. (In general though, while it
feels good to have identified and addressed this
problem, this is a classic example of why programs
have bugs -- there are a HUGE number of rather
improbable ways that a program can get into trouble,
and it's usually beyond human capabilities (or at
least economic realities) to truly identify every
possible contingency in advance.)
2)
Last issue, you probably received two copies
of that issue. Although seemingly similar to the
previous problem, this was limited to two (not five)
issues, and actually resulted from a very different
problem -- for some reason, a duplicate Email
process ran along with the intended one, with each
process doing exactly what it was supposed to do --
send out one issue to each of you. So you got two.
This problem, too, has now been addressed.
3)
Last week, between issues, you likely
received an Email ostensibly coming from this
source, with a title of "Failed to clean v-i-r-u-s
file Sample.exe". As I mentioned in the note I sent
out once I found this was happening, this did NOT
originate from me, and in fact it did NOT contain
the payload file it indicated.
Based on our best
analysis, it appears that a combination of events
allowed this to happen. First, some subscriber to
this Report was apparently infected with a
v-i-r-u-s
having characteristics similar to N-i-m-d-a
(http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.nimda.a@mm.html).
As part of its activity, it searches out all Email
addresses in MAPI-compliant Email stores and in HTML
files on the infected computer. According to
Symantec,
"The worm uses
these email address for the To: and the From:
addresses [of the "infecting" Emails that it's
preparing to send to everyone you've had Email
contact with.]. Thus, mail sent from the infected
computer will appear to have been sent by the people
whose addresses have been found by N-i-m-d-a, not by
the person whose computer is infected."
Which is what
happened. Normally, this would not have sent the
message to YOU, since the subscriber list is never
sent out as a part of the message that reaches you.
In this case, however, this v-i-r-u-s-generated-message
found its way through an unintentional back door in
my Email provider's Email system (which has since
been slammed shut!), and triggered the message to be
sent to each of you by the Email software. Note
though, that because this Email system never
forwards attachments, the infected "attachment" that
was originally part of the message from the first
infected computer, was never actually sent to you.
(The good news is that you only received ONE copy of
that nasty message, so the previous 'fixes' have
apparently worked!)
Take Aways.
·
Even with great care, there will
always be "missed things" when it comes to
programming. Until we turn programming from it
current "black art" into a "science" where every
contingency in the program and within the system
it's operating in can be checked and handled
correctly, bugs will continue to be a fact of
virtual life.
·
Good anti-v-i-r-u-s protection on
EVERY computer is really not optional. These nasty
bugs are getting so sophisticated that the mere act
of previewing an infected Email message can mean
you're infected, and will then unknowingly infect
your friends and associates.
·
Get, use, and keep current, an anti-v-i-r-u-s
system that not only checks incoming Emails, but
also filters your OUTGOING Emails to catch any
potential threat coming out of your system.
·
Finally, while desktop publishing to
the Internet is a wonderful thing, there were a few
advantages to nice, simple, snail-mail
publications...
In the same vein, reader "Nigel" points out:
"In 2, 5 or 10
year's time, imagine how difficult it will be to
solve these sorts of problems. The level of
complexity of modern software is completely
mind-boggling, its connectivity is awesome. And yet
it all appears quite brittle.
There seems to be an
underlying theme that as things become more
complicated, the methods of failure become more
diverse and harder to understand and track down.
Even though Moore's Law may cause complexity to
increase, maybe there is another law which prevents
this law from continuing forever. Maybe there is a
Law of Brittleness? A law which states that as
systems become more complex, the chance of
catastrophic failure increase at a greater rate...
And of course as
things get faster and further beyond direct human
control, when things go wrong, they go wrong very
fast, and in ways that humans can't readily
comprehend."
It has certainly recently felt that way to me.
Hopefully, THIS issue has found its way to you safe,
and sound, and singly!
J
Back to Table of Contents
Life In The Fast Lane - A Competitive
Advantage Too Significant To Ignore? --
Commenting on our recent discussion of how
technology is already, to a small extent, changing
the human form (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20021007/20021007.htm#_Toc21581181),
reader Byron Law explores a very insightful
question:
"I found the discussion of the computer's
evolution interesting. But why does everyone assume
that the computer will ultimately evolve separate
from us? Why not jointly with us? Is it too
implausible that the day might come when machine and
man become one? With the advances of
bio-engineering and nanotechnology, I don't think it
is.
The largest obstacle to overcome in this melding, is
our perceptions and our fears (think Borg). The
idea of computers becoming as ubiquitous as our
breath because they are literally incorporated,
seems a scary proposition to most. But when a few
pioneers demonstrate the competitive advantages of
having taken that first bold step, I imagine that
society's inhibitions may quickly melt away.
Imagine some of the following possible results:
- No more computers, telecommunication devices -
they are bio-integrated and always available.
- Full life recording - What you experience
visually and aurally is recorded. Storage is more
than capable of handling the load. Witness accounts
are now rock solid, and can even be extracted from
the dead. People have a very compelling reason to
"be good".
- Longer, better life - body functions are
monitored and maintained (and even improved) via
nano-probes. The "integrated" enjoy the protection
afforded by a nano-dermal-network of super efficient
solar energy collectors and force field generators
capable of repelling a bullet, of containing an
environment, and of insulating against extreme
temperatures. What if this network also provided a
powerful means of propulsion, through air or
underwater (without any vehicle)?
The day could easily come, that the
non-integrated suffer a tremendous competitive
disadvantage to the integrated.
Man is poised to seize control of his own
evolution (for better or for worse). I'm sure I
have only touched on a -few- possibilities and
-very- few ramifications (both good and bad).
I guess I see our intelligence making a quantum
leap to evolving exponentially along with the
computers that will be bio-integrated. It should be
an interesting ride. I used to think that I would
not see it in my day (I'm only 35), but I'm not so
sure anymore.
Enjoy your articles. Keep up the great work."
Serious "competitive
advantage" could easily overcome peoples' reluctance
to accept even invasive "accessories." Consider
how, on a less personally-invasive note, the
telephone was initially received in British society
in 1876: Sir William Preece, Chief Engineer of the
British Post Office, said,
"The Americans have
need of the telephone, but we do not.
We have plenty of
messenger boys."
He simply couldn't
imagine how anything could, or would need to,
replace the gaggle of messenger boys that kept
information flowing between British businesses. Of
course, the moment that the second British business
installed a telephone, the die was cast.
I wouldn't bet against
this same thing happening again, and again...
ack to Table of Contents
Your
Feedback is Important!
I'd
like to understand your interest in The Harrow
Technology Report, how you make use of it, and
the value you feel it provides to you, your career,
and to your company.
Please send your comments to me at
Jeff@TheHarrowGroup.com .
I
look forward to hearing from you!
And,
if you know of other folks who might find value in
"The Harrow Technology Report," I'd
appreciate your letting them know that they can
subscribe at
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/signup.asp
.
Jeff Harrow
Back to Table of Contents
Finally, lawyers are used to competition.
Especially for trial lawyers, competing and winning
is the name of the game. But who'd have thought
that they'd now be turning to the Internet and eBay
to bid against each other for the evidence they need
for trial?
It's a new twist on the old legal game, where,
according to the July 21 Mercury News (http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/3710149.htm),
one attorney recently paid $2,125 for an old Navy
manual that described how asbestos was used aboard
ship; details that they felt would be crucial to
their asbestos-related case.
Another lawyer recently bid for a collection of
old cigarette ads, to use them as demonstrations of
how they enticed people to become smokers. I wonder
when eBay will be adding an "evidence" keyword,
since trolling for evidence seems likely to be a
growth industry.
Consider these comments from lawyers who are
already taking the "evidence acquisition tack"
across eBay's high seas,
"[eBay is] a virtual
time capsule, [holding] out a seemingly endless
supply of commercial and household artifacts,
historic corporate documents, maintenance manuals
and product catalogs that can help asbestos lawyers
pin down where clients encountered the hazardous
material -- and who can be held liable.
'There is no better
place to shop and buy real evidence than on eBay,'
says attorney Mark Lanier."
Stanford University law professor Deborah Hensler,
saying "Wow!" when she was first told of this
relatively new phenomenon, agreed that,
"Technology is changing the dynamics of litigation."
Which of course should not surprise any of us --
technology is changing almost everything. But I
wonder what Perry Mason might have thought...
Nevertheless, some Sunday afternoon I may have to
search out what random "smoking gun" might be hiding
in my attic; perhaps it could become the object of a
"Price is Right" game, eBay style!
J
Back to Table of Contents
About
"The Harrow Technology Report."
"The Harrow Technology Report" explores the innovations and
trends of many contemporary and emerging technologies, and then draws some less
than obvious connections between them, to help us each survive and prosper in
the Knowledge Age.
"The Harrow Technology Report" is brought to you by Jeffrey
R. Harrow, Principal of The Harrow Group.
http://www.TheHarrowGroup.com .
Where To Find "The
Harrow Technology Report:"
- Via Email -- Sign up for automatic delivery of this journal
(which you can also use as a notification that a new issue is available on
the Web, if you prefer to
read it there), by one of these methods:
- The fastest and easiest method is to go to this Web
page http://www.theharrowgroup.com/signup.asp
and follow its instructions.
Or,
- Send an Email message to TheHarrowGroup@SendMeMore.Net
with the word SUBSCRIBE in the Subject line.
- On
The Web -- You can, of course, also read this journal directly on the
Web at www.TheHarrowGroup.com
.
-
Additionally, to support automated access schemes, the most current issue of
the journal will always be available at this persistent link: www.TheHarrowGroup.com/current.htm
.
Copyright (c) 2001-2005, Jeffrey R. Harrow. All
rights reserved.
Jeffrey R. Harrow maintains that all reasonable care and skill has been used
in the compilation of this publication. However, he shall not be under
any liability for loss or damage (including consequential loss) whatsoever
or howsoever arising as a result of the use of this publication by the
reader, his/her/its servants, agents or any third party.
All third-party trademarks are hereby acknowledged.