Listen to this Issue.
Give those tired eyes a rest.
Quote of the Week.
Transporting people?
Completely
Changing The Rules.
Of batteries and vacuum tubes and
transistors -- and doing it all again...
There's MORE I Can Do For You!
Services that may help your
business better-embrace tomorrow!
From Out of the
Ether...
"DNA computing is very old
hat..."
Storage Update.
A "storage" killer app?
"Toys For Our
Toys" Can Get MUCH More Interesting...
Household appliances and beer --
do they have things in common?
About "The Harrow Technology Report"
Do
you prefer to let your ears do the work of keeping
you in-touch with, and thinking about where
technology is taking us? If so, "The
Harrow Technology
Report" is also available in an audio-on-demand, Web-based, MP3 version.
If
you have an MP3 player on your system (and most do,
such as Window's Media Player, RealPlayer, etc.),
clicking on the link below will either stream the
file to you, or, depending on how your system is
configured, it might download the file before
playing it. Alternatively, if you specifically want
to download the file, simply right-click on the
link, and choose "Save Target As..."
Also,
to learn how you can listen at whatever speed is
most comfortable to you, check out the FAQ at
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/help.htm
.
So,
if you wish, just click on the following link to
listen to this issue!
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/20030324/20030324.mp3
.
Back to Table of Contents
A comment on Star Trek's
"Transporter:"
"Perhaps no other piece of technology, save for the
warp drive, so-colors every mission of every
starship of the Federation. And even those who have
never watched a Star Trek episode recognize the
magic phrase ["Transporter."] It has permeated our
popular culture.
I
recently heard about a young man who, while
inebriated, drove through a red light and ran into a
police cruiser that happened to be lawfully
proceeding through the intersection. At his hearing,
he was asked if he had anything to say.
In
well-founded desperation, he replied, "Yes, your
honor," stood up, took out his wallet, flipped it
open, and muttered into it, "Beam me up, Scotty!""
"Beam Me Up an Einstein, Scotty"
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.11/krauss.html
by Lawrence Krauss,
"Ambrose Swasey" Professor of Physics,
Prof. of Astronomy, and Dept. Chair, Physics.
Case Western Reserve University.
Nov., 1995 Wired Magazine
(With
thanks to reader Robert Roy!)
That's one way to beat a
ticket...
This article was written eight
years ago, before "transporting" HAD occurred
(although so far only to miniscule bits of
information, rather than to the bones and assorted
tissues of Dr. McCoy - see
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20030310/20030310.htm#_Toc34561029).
Yet I can imagine the author's delight, and I can
speculate on how the late Star Trek creator Gene
Roddenberry must be grinning, as he looks down and
watches his sci fi creations becoming more and more
real every day.
By the way, Dr. Krauss'
easy-to-read eight-page article (at
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.11/krauss.html)
provides a fascinating insight into many
other issues that may arise as we move toward more
sophisticated "transporting." He finishes by
summarizing:
"Thinking about transporters has led us into quantum
mechanics, particle physics, computer science,
Einstein's mass-energy relation, and even the
existence of the human soul."
This article IS worth
reading.
Plus, it demonstrates how
people with impressive credentials take science
fiction quite seriously, indeed.
How Far We've Already
Come...
It's also interesting to note
some examples of just how far we've already come in
the eight years since the article's publication:
In one section Dr. Krauss
calculates the amount of data that defines a human
body as 1028 kilobytes -- 16 orders of
magnitude more information than is contained in
every book ever written. (Consider that JUST
the DNA within one body's cells, if unwound from its
double-helix shape, would yield a string six-times
the distance from Earth to the Sun! (NY Times,
"DNA: A Revolution at 50"))
Clearly, storing such a vast
amount of information was completely beyond our
means eight years ago, and still is. Yet today, the
commonly available amount of disk storage has risen
more than one order of magnitude since then, while
the rate itself of storage density growth continues
to accelerate. We are making a dent. Although it's
currently a very small dent given the size of the
problem, our storage capabilities are growing FAR
faster than the complexities of our bodies. So the
end-game, even if very far away, seems a shoo-in.
For another example, Dr. Krauss
estimates that it would take "2,000 times the
present age of the universe...to write the data
describing a human pattern to tape." Although
our steadily-increasing "write speed" over the past
eight years doesn't make a drop in THAT bucket
either, it is interesting to note (as we'll see
later in this issue) that we can now store data at
an impressively-fast one gigabit/second
(inconceivable to many, eight years ago).
...And How Far We Have Yet
To Travel!
Did Arthur C. Clarke's stories
about communications satellites start that ball
rolling? It seems that it did. Will we later find
that Star Trek's Transporter was the embryo of the
real thing...?
Don't Blink!

Back to Table of Contents
Reader Atlant Schmidt recently
sent me a pointer to a March 5 ZDNet article; it
describes Toshiba's intent to demonstrate a fuel
cell that could power a notebook for about five
hours, and then be instantly refilled from a small
methanol fuel cartridge for another five hours, and
so on. (http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-991109.html)
This is certainly something with the potential to
warm the hearts of many a portable-packing person
(while it lines the pockets of the manufacturers,
since they are likely looking towards the "razor
blade" potential of selling proprietary containers
of fuel for far more than the cost of the fuel
itself -- similar to the inkjet printer market.)
Yet many will feel that if this system works as
anticipated, that's a fair price for cutting the
cord to relatively short-lived batteries.
Between continuing advances in both fuel cell and
solar technologies, it seems that the "power
roadblock" to becoming untethered will continue to
ease. BUT -- could it turn out that our present
batteries offer all the power we need for virtually
endless on-the-go computing or communicating? As
improbable as that sounds, This Has Happened Before!
Really?
Yes indeed. I recall having one of the first
portable AM radios. It was HEAVY, it was fragile,
and it didn't run very long on its batteries. All
this because this portable radio used power-hungry
vacuum tubes, just like every other consumer
electronics device of its day, and it required
several different types of specialized batteries to
make it work (low voltage for the filaments, higher
voltage (around 90 volts) for the "plates," and if I
recall correctly, yet a third battery for grid bias
and other purposes.)
(If
you'd like to reminisce, or if you find such things
hard to imagine, there's an interesting collection
of such improbable "portable radios" at
http://www.geocities.com/portable_tubes/mycoll.html
, plus pictures and descriptions of those
early high voltage (and multi-voltage) batteries at
http://www.roberts-radios.co.uk/batteries/batteriesframe.htm
(scroll down the left-hand list to the "Valve"
heading (British for vacuum tube) and choose the
battery type of interest.))
Changing The Rules.
These radios and their
batteries were heavy, clunky, and had rather short
run-times. But if you have a notebook computer,
doesn't this sound like a familiar theme passed down
through the decades? In those days of tube radios,
"Power" was perceived as THE "portable problem," yet
is was NOT a breakthrough in power technology
that opened the era of "usable" portable radios and
more -- it was a breakthrough that dramatically
reduced the power-DEMANDS for portable electronics.
The transistor, and later the integrated circuit.
Suddenly, what was previously
"impossible" (lightweight, long-runtime (by
comparison) radios, pocket-sized "walkie-talkies,"
and far more), thrived on the power technology that
was already available. Not that we didn't want
longer life still -- we always have and always will
until the power within a device exceeds its useful
life. But the breakthrough from vacuum tube to
transistor changed all of the rules.
Today, we're doing astounding things with portable
electronics and the portable power sources that are
available. Yet notebooks routinely gasp their last
and cell phones become mute until they can be
refilled at the nearest electron pump (power socket)
or, perhaps in a few years, from a spare methanol
cartridge. Portable power sources ARE getting
significantly better. But a "lifelong" power source
for portable electronics is still beyond our reach,
in the same way that a long-term power source for
portable electronics was unimaginable in the days of
vacuum tubes. Until, that is, transistors "changed
the rules."
And Again?
So in this context, what could
"change the rules" again? What could again upset
the portable power applecart in our favor?
Today, our transistors work by
modulating the flow of millions of electrons. That
flow does wonderful things, yet it also wastes power
through generating heat, which causes its own set of
problems. But we are continuously shrinking of the
size of the transistors that we print onto silicon,
with each generation demanding less and less power
(although the number of those transistors on a chip
grows so fast that the overall power-demand keeps
rising).
But we're also exploring
experimental "single electron transistors" that use
nanotechnology to let one SINGLE electron do the
work of millions or billions of electrons (and hence
save power and heat) through carbon nanotubes and
Quantum transistors and more. And there is work
being done on how to harness biotechnologies to do
"logic" in completely different ways (can you
imagine portable "electronic" devices that do their
own photosynthesis for power, or perhaps run off of
the energy released by chemically splitting DNA's
double helix? See
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20030310/20030310.htm#_Toc34561030
and
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/computers/
article/0,12543,241609,00.html
- courtesy of reader John Matrow.
The Promise of NBIC
This potential "changing of the
rules" as a result of NBIC research (the convergence
of Nanotechnology, Biology & medicine, Information
sciences, and Cognitive sciences) holds very real
potentials for making the change from vacuum tubes
to transistors and ICs, seem like kid-stuff.
With NBIC devices, today's
portable power technology may (again) be more than
sufficient for future, exceedingly low-power NBIC
devices. Especially since improvements to existing
power sources are already, synergistically,
benefiting from early NBIC research (such as batteries with
electrolytes and anodes and cathodes that are
optimized at the molecular level (see
http://www.newswise.com/articles/2003/3/BATTERY.SNL.html courtesy of reader Dana Hoggatt); nano
turbines that are ultra efficient at extracting
power from fuel; etc.)
I'm certainly not suggesting
that such breakthroughs will happen and be
commercialized soon, nor am I (at all) suggesting
that current research into fuel cells and enhanced
battery technologies be abandoned -- they will be
very beneficial regardless of if NBIC
power-demand-reduction breakthroughs take place.
But I am suggesting that we remember that we've
ALREADY been through one major component
revolution that significantly shrank our power needs
-- similar breakthroughs may yet occur.
This is a reminder that NBIC
holds the potential to change everything, and that
one day, we may have forgotten the all-too-common
airport rush to find the one available AC socket at
a gate (I carry a 3-tap octopus so I can always tap
into a full outlet.) We may yet see the day when
our cell phones no longer have to be charged, and
when we routinely expect that anything we buy will
"just work forever."
Such "power independence" might
certainly stimulate fascinating new products, such
as these concept ideas from IDEO (http://www.ideo.com/portfolio/re.asp?x=50165),
brought to our attention by reader John Matrow:
Consider the "Ring Phone,"
which answers a call when you sense its vibrations
and naturally assume the universal gesture for
talking on the phone. It would be voice-activated,
of course.

Or, how about these bits of
"active jewelry" for the foot?

Called "GPS Toes," these would
communicate with a special GPS unit on your belt or
in your purse. As the GPS guides you along your
route, they will vibrate or otherwise excite your
toes to signal when you should turn left or right.
I assume that it could also vary the intensity of
the stimulation to give you a sense of how rapidly
you're approaching the turn point. (I won't
consider what they might do if you take a wrong
turn...)
"Impossible" Expectations?
Do you think that the
possibility of such change is just hyperbole? Few
people touting those multi-pound, short-lived,
tube-and-multiple-battery powered "portable" radios
forty to fifty years ago could have imagined today's
sophisticated cell phones that can sometime run for
a week on a charge. Just wait until that power
lifetime rises to a year, or to a decade. Couldn't
such a change in the power equation spark new
generations of "goodies," such as those we've just
discussed?
Again, Don't Blink!

Back to Table of Contents
Begin Self-Serving Advertisement
You
may not realize it, but there's much more to
The Harrow Group than just "The
Harrow Technology Report."
For
almost twenty years, as I've been sharing my
research on the ever-faster-moving and converging
technologies that are changing how we work, live,
and play, I've also been working directly with
businesses and organizations, large and small, to
help them understand and address how these changes
may affect them, their customers, and their
customers' businesses, through a series of:
·
Presentations -
Highly engaging, interactive, multimedia,
constantly-updated presentations and keynote
speeches to individual businesses, internal groups,
and trade organizations, helping participants to
better understand and appreciate how technology has
brought us to where we are today, and where it's
likely to lead us tomorrow.
·
Workshops
- Beginning with the presentation described above
(to give all participants a common understanding and
insight), the workshop further engages attendees to
explore how this march of technology might affect
their individual businesses and organizations, and
their specific needs.
·
One-On-One Consulting -
Individualized
consulting services, available via phone or
in-person, to help you explore the topics and trends
discussed in The Harrow Technology Report,
and related issues.
Please
continue here to view
additional information.
Then, contact me at
Jeff@TheHarrowGroup.com with any
additional questions, to discuss fees, and to
schedule a consulting event. I look forward to
working with you!
End Self-Serving Advertisement
Back to Table of Contents
Pondering our recent discussion
about using DNA molecules as massively powerful
computing elements, and/or as ultra-dense organic
memory (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20030310/20030310.htm#_Toc34561030),
reader Colin Ford suggests that we pay attention to
how Nature uses these "bits of Life:"
"Jeff, DNA computing is very old hat. I have been
doing it all my life! It's rather like the famous
answer from the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy to
the question: "What is the meaning of life, the
universe, and everything?"
"The answer is 42."
So
it is with DNA computing; we know the answer, we
know the question, but what we don't know is how to
ask the question in sufficient terms to make the
question relative...
A
dog is a wonderful mathematical calculating device.
When you throw a dog a Frisbee, it quickly does the
math to calculate the trajectory, velocity, wind
drift, etc. The result? The dog catches the Frisbee
in it's teeth! A wonderful example of a DNA
computer in action.
Now
if we can only figure how the dog does it we will be
much further down the road to properly asking the
question: What is the meaning of life, the universe,
and everything?"
Colin brings up a good point.
We've been touching on current investigations into
how the lower levels of DNA work, which is a very
necessary beginning before we can answer Colin's
question. But once we have a better understanding
of DNA's intricacies at the "component" level, the
next step might be to better-understand the
"systems" that the DNA comprises (sounds like NBIC
to me). Remember -- Nature has already been
optimizing those "systems" for millions of years!
Back to Table of Contents
We're all-too familiar with the
exponentially increasing rate of the
price/performance capabilities of disk drives;
that's why, as we explored in this issue's Quote Of
The Week, just eight years ago a very large disk
held ten gigabytes -- a size so small by today's
standards that it's hardly available for PCs.
So it shouldn't surprise any of
us that Storage will continue to get denser, faster,
and cheaper. But those are just the "evolutionary"
changes that we've learned to expect. What about
completely "changing the rules," as Aprilis is doing
(www.aprilisinc.com/index.htm),
as described in the Feb., 2003 Laser Focus World
(http://lfw.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?
Section=ARTCL&Subsection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=
168962&KEYWORD=holographic%20disk&p=12)
brought to our attention by reader Michael Pope.
They have apparently developed
a holographic medium for "CDs" that will allow
storing "hundreds of gigabytes," while reading and
writing the data at 1 gigabit per second (FAR faster
than today's disks.)
While impressive, that's not
the best part. This disk contains information
written in tiny holographic patterns, and because
holographic patterns can be read "in parallel,"
rather than (conceptually) one-bit-at-a-time as in
today's storage systems, it's possible to search for
matches in the data far more quickly than we can
using today's full-search techniques -- because the
CPU never gets involved in these searches! They're
carried out in a completely different manner, as
described by Aprilis' David Waldman:
"One feature of the Aprilis holographic system that
cannot be duplicated in CD and DVD systems (or any
serially read system, for that matter) is its
fast-search capability. A search for a certain
string of data is carried out locally by encoding
the read beam. The analog strength of the return
signal is in direct proportion to the strength of
the match between the encoded read beam and the data
on the disk; a simple increase in a photosensor
reading signals a match. This is in contrast to an
ordinary storage system, which must include its
central processing unit in the search for a string
of data."
According to John Berg, Aprilis' CEO, "A
comparison of the Aprilis drive to an ordinary hard
drive, performed by IBM (Armonk, NY), found that the
equivalent of a half-hour search on the hard drive,
took a few milliseconds on the holographic disk."
He
concludes, "For business use, this could be the
'killer app,'"
It could indeed, considering
how quickly our data stores are growing, and the
importance of our being able to find, access, and
meaningfully use that data (think huge databases of
customer information, for example.) And with
virtually no impact on the CPU.
Could this be the beginning of
an interesting trend towards subsystems that
revolutionarily improve performance, while also
freeing-up processor power to be used by other
tasks?
Just one of many
possibilities...
Yet once again, Don't Blink!

Back to Table of Contents
Last issue, we explored how a
Japanese toy manufacturer will soon be selling fully
operational 1.5-inch TVs destined for the walls of
doll houses (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20030310/20030310.htm#_Toc34561035),
and I wondered if this,
"...might well get out of
hand? Could this set a foul precedent, that we're
expected to provide our toys with toys? What
happens when we eventually have domestic robots --
will they demand similar accoutrements?"
Little did I know that Fosters
Beer has been thinking exactly along those
"domestic-robot problem" lines, and has even given
us a hint!
Brought to our attention by
Australian reader Grant Perkins, Fosters has made a
wonderful commercial that explores some unexpected
directions of where autonomous household devices
might choose to go; they've made it available on the
Web at
http://www.fosters.co.uk/
.
(Roll
over the "Our Ads" button in the upper-right of the
screen and choose "Drink, Think." Then, roll over
either the Modem or Broadband button at the bottom
of this second screen and choose "Watch It." Now,
sit back and enjoy.)
For those of you who are video
or bandwidth-challenged, the premise is that a young
man receives the household robot he recently ordered
(actually Honda's robot) and unpacks it from its
foam "peanuts" in his living room, leaving quite a
mess.

He instructs the robot to clean
his apartment, and then he heads off to work.

Expecting great things from his
new "servant," he arrives home from work and is
surprised to find the mess of the robot's packing
peanuts still all over the floor.

So he searches for the robot,
where to his dismay, he finds it in bed with the
vacuum cleaner!

Which does not faze (phase?)
the robot, which leisurely drinks a Fosters in its
rosy afterglow.

(This is not an
endorsement of, nor an advertisement for, the
products mentioned.
But their commercial does deserve an award for
originality (or might that be for prescience?)).
So -- miniature TVs gracing
doll house walls may turn out to be the LEAST
of our "home electronics" problems!
About
"The
Harrow
Technology Report"
"The Harrow Technology Report" explores the innovations and
trends of many contemporary and emerging technologies, and then draws some less
than obvious connections between them, to help us each survive and prosper in
the Knowledge Age.
"The Harrow Technology Report" is brought to you by Jeffrey
R. Harrow, Principal of The Harrow Group.
http://www.TheHarrowGroup.com .
Where To Find "The
Harrow Technology Report:"
- Via Email -- Sign up for automatic delivery of this journal
(which you can also use as a notification that a new issue is available on
the Web, if you prefer to
read it there), by one of these methods:
- The fastest and easiest method is to go to this Web
page http://www.theharrowgroup.com/signup.asp
and follow its instructions.
Or,
- Send an Email message to TheHarrowGroup@SendMeMore.Net
with the word SUBSCRIBE in the Subject line.
- On
The Web -- You can, of course, also read this journal directly on the
Web at www.TheHarrowGroup.com
.
-
Additionally, to support automated access schemes, the most current issue of
the journal will always be available at this persistent link: www.TheHarrowGroup.com/current.htm
.
Copyright (c) 2001-2005, Jeffrey R. Harrow. All
rights reserved.
Jeffrey R. Harrow maintains that all reasonable care and skill has been used
in the compilation of this publication. However, he shall not be under
any liability for loss or damage (including consequential loss) whatsoever
or howsoever arising as a result of the use of this publication by the
reader, his/her/its servants, agents or any third party.
All third-party trademarks are hereby acknowledged.