LISTEN
To This Issue.
Give your eyes a rest.
Quote
of the Week.
Changing the rules -- using electron
"spin" instead of electron
"movement"
for faster, cooler, computing.
"Listening?"
Now, Pick Your Own Speed!
"Listen" to The Harrow
Technology Report as quickly or as slowly as you
wish!
The
World of the Tiny.
Robots working at the atomic scale and test
tube quantum computers --
examples of the "transistor" of the 21st
century!
Teaching
The Old CRT Dog, New Tricks.
CRTs don't have to be heavy and deep.
Twist
'n View?
Work continues on displays that we can bend,
fold, spindle, and mutilate.
RoboRoach!
The roach that goes bump in the night -- but
more!
About
"The Harrow Technology Report"
Do you prefer to let your ears do the work of keeping
you in-touch with, and thinking about where technology
is taking us? If
so, "The Harrow Technology Report" is
also available in an audio-on-demand, Web-based, MP3
version.
If you have an MP3 player on your system (and most
do, such as Window's Media Player, RealPlayer, etc.),
clicking on the link below will either stream the file
to you, or, depending on how your system is configured,
it might download the file before playing it.
Alternatively, if you specifically want to
download the file, simply right-click on the link, and
choose "Save Target As..."
Also, find out how you can have FAR more
control over how you listen, in an article later in this
issue!
So, if you wish, just click on the following link to
listen to this issue!
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/20020107/20020107.mp3
.
Back to
Table of Contents
California NanoSystems recently reported that it can
now continuously control the "spin" of an
electron, under electronic control.
Great.
That might be interesting to a few scientists -- but to
you and me? Yet
if we look closer, this seemingly arcane development
might have a very significant effect on our future
computers and electronics:
"The long-term
impact [of this development] is that one can think about
"spin engineering" semiconductors, in contrast
to today's [semiconductors], which are "charge
engineered."
One can think about extremely fast [spin-engineered]
electronics that are very dense with very low heat
dissipation, because only the spin of the electron
changes. The heat it takes to flip the spin of an
electron is infinitesimal compared to moving the charge
in a wire back and forth..."
"Think of one combined unit that integrates logic,
storage, and communication for computing.
We envision using a mixture of optical,
electronic, and photonic techniques to prepare and
manipulate spin-based information. The spin could be
stored in semiconductors, run at frequencies many times
faster than today's technology, and work at room
temperature. And all in a single nanostructure. Then
imagine millions of these nanostructures working
together in a device small by human standards.
What such devices will do
is up to scientists and engineers to determine. But the
most exciting prospects are the revolutionary ones,
rather than simple extrapolations of today's
technology."
David
Awschalom
Director, Center for Spintronics and Quantum Computation
at UCSB
NanoTech Planet.com
Dec. 10, 2001
http://www.nanotech-planet.com/features/article/0,4028,6571_937101,00.html
(With thanks to reader Kenneth LaCrosse.)
Considering that the heat generated by the millions
of transistors in today's chips is one of the limiting
factors in future chip designs, this may be a
"cool" discovery (which could also
dramatically reduce power consumption), indeed.
Back to
Table of Contents
As you're probably aware, besides being available
"in print" via Email and on the Web, The
Harrow Technology Report is also available as an
on-demand Web-based "radio" show.
Many thousands of you use this to get your dose
of technology insight while giving your eyes a rest.
(In fact, my musings represent the first and
longest-running regularly scheduled technology
"radio show" on the Web.)
The Early Days.
If you've been a listener for some years, you might
recall when I used to offer the "radio show"
using a technology from VOXware called ToolVOX.
This was an amazing voice-only audio codec (COmpressor/DECompressor)
that reduced the half-hour radio show from a 70 megabyte
WAV file, to about a half-megabyte (which is
significantly smaller than the MP3 format that we use
today -- MP3 compresses the 70 megabyte WAV file to
about 4 megabytes). In those bandwidth-constrained days of 9600 and 14.4 modems,
this level of compression was an "enabling
technology" for Web-based audio-on-demand content.
ToolVOX performed this miracle by
"modeling" the human voice, only sending the
much shorter "instructions" for that model to
the ToolVOX client on your PC, where it recreated the
voice. (By comparison, most other audio codecs send the actual
compressed audio, which cannot compress nearly as small
as just a stream of "instructions.")
This amazing compression ratio alone was what
convinced me to use ToolVOX in those earliest days of
the Web. But
there was more...
The Point?
In today's world of relatively high bandwidth
connections to businesses and to many homes, the file
size and bandwidth of a half hour "radio show"
is far less of an issue than was once the case, yet many
of you still bemoan the fact that I finally had to
retire ToolVOX since it had long been unsupported by
VOXware. You
missed ToolVOX because it provided one other very useful
attribute: it
allowed each listener to adjust the SPEED (the tempo) of
the voice playback, faster or slower as they wished, WITHOUT
turning my voice into Alvin-the-chipmunk, or into a s l
o
w drawl.
So, ever since ToolVOX was retired, I've received a
constant stream of requests that I speak both faster and
slower. And
that ties my voice up into the proverbial Gordian knot.
Have It YOUR Way!
But help is now at hand, thanks to reader Armin Von
Werner. He
points out that if you use the free WinAmp program (www.winamp.com)
as your MP3 player, an also-free and very cool WinAmp
plug-in called "PaceMaker," written by Olli
Parviainen (http://www.iki.fi/oparviai/pacemaker),
will again allow you to speed-up or slow-down this
journal (or any other audio, for that matter) so you can
listen at your own most-comfortable rate!
Install WinAmp, then PaceMaker.
(During the installation process, you may wish to
allow WinAmp to become your default .mp3 player, but
that is not necessary.)
Then, configure WinAmp to use PaceMaker as described
in the PaceMaker documentation, or follow these steps
after BOTH WinAmp and PaceMaker are installed:
1)
From within WinAmp, hit CTRL-K.
2)
In the left-hand list, under "Plug-ins,"
select the "DSP/Effect" item.
3)
In the right-hand window select the "PaceMaker
tempo controller" entry so that it is highlighted,
and then close that window.
You'll notice a small window appear titled
"Pacemaker" with several controls on it --
more on that in a moment.
Now, if you allowed WinAmp to become your default
.mp3 player, simply clicking on the "Listen to this
Issue" link in any THTR issue should automatically
begin playing it in WinAmp.
(If WinAmp is NOT
your default .mp3 player, you can copy and paste the
"listen" address from any THTR issue into
WinAmp using the "Add URL" button in the
lower-left corner.)
Now that the THTR issue is playing in WinAmp, you can
adjust the "Tempo" slider on the PaceMaker
"Sound Control" panel to make the playback as
fast or as slow as you wish! (Leave the Pitch and Speed sliders in their center position.)
That's it!
(Please note that it's
beyond the scope of THTR to provide any additional
instructions or support for WinAmp or PaceMaker; check
out their respective Web sites if you have questions. And of course you install and use such tools at your own
risk. But
it only took me a few minutes to get this combination up
and running flawlessly.)
Once again, I can zip through my quality control
checks without having to listen at the same rate that I
speak, and you can now pick the playback speed that
suits you best.
Back To The Future.
In a "Back To The Futuresque" way, THTR
listeners have again regained what was once lost, thanks
to the increasing power of today's processors that makes
it possible to perform this magic in real time, without
the restrictive voice modeling of only a few years ago.
Enjoy!
Back to
Table of Contents
One of the tenets of The Harrow Technology Report is
that I never write an issue with any preconceived or
scheduled notion of its content -- each issue represents
my take on the most significant and interesting
"computing" innovations and trends that have
recently become apparent -- those which I believe will
have a pragmatic effect on how we all will work, live, and
play in the future.
This editorial technique is what had us exploring the
Web long before it became a household word, had us
learning what made flexible displays from E-Ink tick
when the idea of such displays were still firmly rooted
in science fiction, and more recently, has had us taking
an ever-closer look at the myriad techniques and
technologies that seem poised to completely change the
way we design and build things, as we consider trading
in our nuts and bolts for molecules and atoms and
electrons. In
short, the slowly-emerging world of the tiny, commonly
referred to as "nanotechnology."
Nanotechnology isn't any one "science," it
has many definitions depending on the subject, and it
isn't strictly limited to inorganic things like
"electronics," since living things like DNA
components also seem to fit.
With "nanotechnology" being so elusive
and formative, many people and businesses discount it.
But as I look back over the past couple of years
of my writings, I find that "things nano" are
creeping in in a pattern reminiscent of how we once
discussed the potential for incredible gains in
processor power, memory, storage, and the Internet,
which all seemed both unimportant and improbable at the
time.
Which brings us to this week's "tiny"
events.
Robotic Workers.
Industrial robots are nothing new -- visit an auto
assembly plant or a similar facility in many other
fields, and specialized robots move things, assemble
them, weld and solder parts, paint things, and much
more. But
if the work of MIT researcher Sylvain Martel (brought to
our attention by reader Dana Hoggart) is successful, a
new breed of robot is going to be building things with
atoms, rather than with sheet steel!
These are called "NanoWalkers," as
described in the Dec. 19 SmallTimes (http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=2752§ion_id=53),
which can walk around on piezoelectric legs
faster than a roach can scurry, or move ultra-precisely
in steps only two-billionths of a meter long.
(These autonomous workers are powered through an
electrical charge on their work surface.)
But what would we do with robots that can move in
such tiny increments?
According to Martel, they would wield their
on-board scanning-tunneling microscope (STM) to push
atoms around into just the configuration needed for a
project. They
could also use lasers and micromachining tools to build
things from the "atomic bottom," up.
And these NanoWalkers would not be working blind
-- they could get the "big picture" of the
area in which they're working through a built-in CCD
camera, while the STM would provide the precise imaging
needed at the atomic level. NanoWalkers might also be
"social," with a swarm of them working as a
coordinated whole using built-in infrared communications
to chat among themselves.
MIT isn't alone in pursuing the idea of robots that
can do work where human fingers can not tread -- another
example comes from Germany's University of Karlsruhe,
where they use a different type of nano robot to collect
and transport individual cells to the appropriate areas
within an experiment, and even to hold a single cell in
place while another robot injects drugs or other
compounds into that individual cell!
Yes, nanorobots are in their infancy, but as we
continue to explore (and increasingly imitate) how
nature builds things -- from the atoms, up -- devices
like these may become the new tools of the trade. Let's just hope they don't begin to demand nano-sized water
coolers and coffee pots...
Test Tube Computers.
Speaking of things tiny, several of you pointed out
IBM's Almaden Research Center's recent success in
performing the most complicated "quantum
computer" calculation yet.
IBM scientists dumped a billion-billion
custom-constructed molecules into a test tube and
convinced them to act as a seven-qubit (QUantum BIT)
computer, which then solved a simple version of the math
behind many of today's cryptographic systems (Shor's
Algorithm). The
bottom line is that quantum computers can factor numbers
dramatically faster than their traditional counterparts
-- in fact exponentially faster.
(There's that same "exponential" word
again, which so-changed the face of
"traditional" computing...)
While this experiment (factoring the number 15) may
seem trivial, as the number of qubits in these quantum
computers grow, they're going to dramatically change the
rules for what constitutes "unbreakable"
encryption. (See http://www.research.ibm.com/resources/news/20011219_quantum.shtml
for additional insights.)
And that will affect governments, commerce, and
eventually you and me.
Back To The Future.
I remember when transistors first hit the shelves. Most electronics people (and businesses), schooled in vacuum
tubes, had trouble understanding how these little silver
cans worked, and so they often dismissed them since the
tubes of the day were FAR more versatile and could
handle FAR more power.
As the transistor matured though, it became a
disruptive technology that changed all the rules, not
only for the electronics industry, but also for almost
every aspect of society.
Those people and businesses who stayed on the
cutting edge of what these new transistors (and later
integrated circuits) could do, were in the best position
to reap the benefits of putting the tubes out to
pasture.
Now again, as I watch the many fledgling nano efforts
around the globe, I have the feeling that when we look
back at today, we'll recognize that nanotechnology was
the twenty-first century's transistor, similarly
changing almost everything around us, but to a far
greater degree!
Can you picture just how improbable a multi-gigahertz
processor with a gigabyte of memory and hundreds of
gigabytes of disk space would have seemed to you only
five years ago? Yet
they're on consumer shelves today.
So as we continue to explore these seemingly arcane
and unconnected nano events in future issues,
Don't Blink,

because if (when?) we get really good at working with
nature's basic building blocks, we'll be able to build
virtually anything that we can conceive!
And we do have SUCH fertile
imaginations...!
Back
to Table of Contents
Your Feedback is Important!
I'd like
to understand your interest in The Harrow Technology
Report, how you make use of it, and the value you
feel it provides to you, your career, and to your
company.
Please
send your comments to me at Jeff@TheHarrowGroup.com
.
I look
forward to hearing from you!
And, if
you know of other folks who might find value in “The
Harrow Technology Report,” I’d appreciate your
letting them know that they can subscribe at http://www.theharrowgroup.com/signup.asp
.
Jeff Harrow
Back to
Table of Contents
With slim LCD monitors finally dropping into the
affordable range, a growing number of desktops are
replacing the huge, heavy, and deep monitor cases that
housed the long necks and large electromagnets of
traditional Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs).
But just when we might begin to sing a eulogy to the
dearly departing "picture tube," new
materials, and very new ideas, might brighten the CRT's
future!
Brought to our attention by reader Dana Hoggart, the
New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/16/technology/circuits/16NEXT.html)
describes how two IBM scientists have thought
"outside the box" to come up with a design
that may prove far thinner, and far superior, to the
CRTs of old.
The Old.
You might recall that a traditional CRT has a coating
of phosphor (which glows when struck by high-speed
electrons) on the inside of the front glass.
The cathode sits at the back of the long neck and
is heated to the point that it glows, giving off lots of
electrons. A
very high voltage attracts those electrons to the face
of the tube where they strike the phosphor dots and
cause them to glow, while magnetic forces applied by the
electromagnets steer the beam as it rushes down the neck
of the tube, causing it to "sweep" back and
forth and up and down to create the images we know and
love (or hate). Of
course it's a tad more involved than that, especially
for color CRTs, but that's the general idea (see http://www.howstuffworks.com/tv2.htm
for a more detailed explanation).
The New?
But now, picture (sorry) a very different type of
CRT. It
still has a phosphor coating on the inside of the front
glass, but the long neck and cathode are replaced with
another flat plate that acts as the cathode.
It sits one-inch in back of the front plate,
separated by a special stainless steel and ceramic
magnet that is pierced with thousands of precise, tiny
holes -- one hole for each pixel on the screen!
In effect, each pixel's magnet attracts electrons
from the flat cathode and forms them into a tightly
focused beam for its particular pixel.
By controlling the number of electrons that are
passed through each magnet at any instant, the
brightness of that particular pixel is controlled,
resulting in a full-screen picture.
(Color versions, similar to today's CRTs, would
provide a smaller red, green, and blue phosphor dot for
each "pixel," yielding a full-color image to
the eye.)
Not only would this design, if it ever leaves the
research labs, yield very thin CRTs (comparable to LCD
panels), but it would also do away with one of the major
headaches of conventional color CRTs -- convincing that
one electron beam to sweep so precisely over every pixel
on the face of the tube that it always lands on the
correct color pixel.
This rarely happens perfectly, and the result is
"mis-convergence" in some areas, reducing
detail and leaving a colored fringe around some objects,
often at the edges of the tube.
Since this new design has one virtual electron
gun for each and every pixel, mis-convergence would be a
thing of the past.
Of course, like most research ideas, there can be
quite a trip from the lab to the corner superstore.
But whether or not this innovation "makes
it," it is a good reminder that taking off our
traditional blinders to use new technologies (the new
type of magnet in this case), in new ways (the thin,
flat CRT), holds the potential to paint a pretty (and
thin) picture, indeed!
Back to
Table of Contents
Sit on a PDA and you're likely to
hear a "CRACK" that tells you it's time to
upgrade to a newer model, because most PDA displays are
made of glass that will only twist or bend one time.
Some companies, such as E-Ink and Xerox PARC, are
producing signs on flexible substrates, but these
technologies are currently better suited for relatively
static displays; they don't yet have the pixel density
or switching speed or contrast to support demanding
applications such as video.
But this, according to the Dec. 5 CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ptech/12/05/electronic.paper.race.ap/index.html)
and brought to our attention by reader Michael Sweet,
may well change.
Royal Philips Electronics has used
their version of completely plastic transistors to
produce a working 2-inch display composed of 4,096
grayscale pixels that can switch fast enough to display
video, and it has a contrast ratio similar to that of a
pen writing on paper!
This won't yet produce "sittable" PDAs, since
even though the transistors are plastic, this initial
display is still produced on a glass substrate.
But Philips feels that transferring this
technology to a flexible substrate isn't that far off.
Imagine what low cost flexible displays might mean --
completely new shapes for our devices, such as
wristwatches where the band itself is the display, or
similar "band" variations of cell phones, MP3
players, and the like.
Or, if the technology matures enough for the
display to cover the entire surface of a garment,
imagine the potential for military camouflage -- the
shirt could use built-in video cameras to scan what's
behind you, and then display that image (appropriate
resized) on the front of the shirt, making you much more
difficult to see.
On the other hand, I was recently walking through a
department store and shuddered at the selection of
clothing with manufacturers' names boldly emblazoned on
them in four-inch (or larger) letters -- imagine the
advertising opportunities for a sweatshirt with a
flexible display that can be updated through a built-in
pager-like receiver...
Hummm -- I think that's one technological advance
where I'll pass...
Back to
Table of Contents
Finally, how would you like to come across THIS
little beastie crawling along your kitchen counter?
This isn't a joke -- this cyborg (a combination of a
living thing and a computer) is a remote controlled
roach, walking the laboratories of Japan's Tsukuba
University.
Brought to our attention by reader T.W. Cook (http://www.intercorr.com/roach.htm),
the roach's "backpack" contains a receiver
that converts the signals from a remote control into
electrical stimuli that are applied to the base of the
roach's antennae. This
allows the "operator" to get the roach to
stop, go forward, backup, or turn left and right,
on-command.
This might sound trivial
(and hard on the roach), but the Japanese
government sees the potential for controllable insects,
fitted with sensors, to conduct inspection trips through
tiny machine passages looking for corrosion and other
problem; they're backing the research with $5 million.
Research into electrically stimulating living systems
is also a starting point for, er, getting the bugs out
of more sophisticated computer-nervous system
interconnections. And
that holds great potential for people with certain
disabilities.
So the next time you see a creepy-crawly scurrying
around when you flip on the kitchen light, look
carefully before your grab the bug spray -- it might be
Version 2.3b1 of your spouse's (or your kid's) latest
project, and all you'll need is the remote control!