LISTEN To This
Issue.
Quote
of the Week.
From
Atoms To Bits - A Cautionary Tale
A
Convergence You Might Not Have Expected...
DVD
Backup - Follow-up.
From
Out of the Ether: DNA Meets Technology.
Ad
Wars.
About
"The Harrow Technology Report"
Do you prefer to let your ears do the work of keeping you
in-touch with, and thinking about where technology is taking us?
If so, "The Harrow Technology Report" is
also available in an audio-on-demand, Web-based, MP3 version.
If you have an MP3 player on your system (and most do, such
as Window's Media Player, RealPlayer, etc.), clicking on the
link below will either stream the file to you, or, depending on
how your system is configured, it might download the file before
playing it. Alternatively,
if you specifically want to download the file, simply
right-click on the link, and choose "Save Target
As..."
So, if you wish, just click on the following link to listen
to this issue! http://www.TheHarrowGroup.com/articles/20011105/20011105.mp3
.
"We have left the Windows
era for the Internet era, and the PC era for the consumer
electronics era. The implications of this are enormous ... but
it is Internet-based software and services, and consumer
electronics-style devices, that are driving the industry."
David Coursey,
July 11 AnchorDesk
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/
stories/story/0,10738,2783792,00.html
Email is a wonderful thing (spam aside).
It's broken down many hierarchical boundaries as people
instantaneously communicate across corporate strata, and across
oceans. It frees
people to be able to continue their business and social
correspondence on their schedule, even while traveling as
physical mail collects at home. For these reasons and more,
Email has become the undisputed "killer app" of the
Internet, and of the PC.
Now, under the threat of disease-tainted physical mail, Email is
becoming even more accepted as a business and as a social tool,
because while Email may contain computer viruses that can cause
havoc to our silicon servants, those "diseases" can't
(currently) jump the species boundary between silicon and
carbon-based life forms. So
for sound security and economic reasons discussed in the Oct. 29
InformationWeek Daily, a growing number of businesses are
exploring ways to safely and effectively replace physical mail
with Email (http://update.informationweek.com/cgi-bin4
/flo?y=eEqg0CCgtO0V20TWa0A7).
BUT -- this is NOT a risk-free decision!
My concern isn't about ensuring the confidentiality of Email
messages -- messages can be encrypted sufficiently ("good
enough") for most commercial purposes using off the shelf
software such as the PGP series - http://www.pgp.com/
. (Which is
not to say that an encrypted Email message cannot be intercepted
and read by an interloper with sufficient interest and means,
but that can also happen to a physical message.)
Instead, my concern is that we WILL use the current
security situation to move a significant amount of business
correspondence and billing onto the Internet!
Eh? Have I lost my
enthusiasm for technology and for Email?
The Problem.
Not at all. But
let's gaze forward some months or years as this trend towards
Email and away from physical mail, evolves.
Let's say that 50% of today's business correspondence,
billing, and payments have made the switch from atoms to bits.
Many people will be happy and save money -- it costs a
business far less to send its bill or invitation or annual
report via Email, and with appropriate antivirus protection it's
relatively safe to open most mail that arrives in our virtual
InBoxes. And the
Postal Service would be able to save money as well, by reducing
the trucks and planes and infrastructure necessary to move the
physical mail.
This would seem to be a good thing, overall. But -- could it be "Too Good?"
What happens, once business relies on Email as it currently
relies on physical mail, if the Internet then becomes the target
of a sophisticated and sustained attack?
What if this renders Email unusable for an extended
period of time?
Today, as the safety of physical mail is being called into
question, we have the Email alternative to turn to.
But in an Email-reliant tomorrow, what would we do if the
Email couldn't go through?
The physical postal system might well have shrunk its
infrastructure to the point that it could no longer handle a
return to paper bills, letters, and checks.
Besides, people might have changed their lifestyle to
rely on the location-independence of Email; going back to the
constraints of physical delivery might be problematic.
Commerce, and society, could grind to a halt if the Email
couldn't get through!
What To Do?
I'm certainly not suggesting that we stay away from
"business Email."
It seems clear that even without recent events, things
were headed in this Email direction already, and I rather expect
that Email adoption will continue to accelerate.
But I am suggesting that as Email does become as
important to our society as the physical mail system before it,
that we take care -- great care -- to assure that this
newly-critical economic asset (Email, and the Internet that
carries it) is as well-protected and defended as any major
infrastructure central to our economy, such as the water,
electricity, gas, and telephone networks.
Shoring up the Internet with its Email and World Wide Web is not
a trivial task. But
I believe that assuring its health and safety has already moved
from being a luxury, to becoming a vital necessity. And it will
become even more so over time.
Life Imitating Art.
Tom Clancy has the dubious distinction of having foretold the
jetliner-turned-bomb in Debt of Honor.
Indeed, had United 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania,
instead found its way to its probable mark in Washington DC,
life might have imitated Clancy's art with the U.S. Capital in
flames.
But what does this have to do with safeguarding the Internet
and its Web and Email?
I'd already written this article before I passed through the
Vancouver airport on my way home from speaking at the National
Post/University of British Columbia "Innovative
Strategies for Changing Technology: An Executive Forum"
(http://www.nationalpost.com/events/ubc/forum.html
). But as I
glanced at a bookstore in the concourse, a new Clancy novel,
"CyberNation," caught my eye, and immediately
thereafter my wallet. Because
as you're probably beginning to suspect, this new Clancy book
explores these very issues: of what happens once society has
moved the cogs and gears of commerce onto the Internet, which is
then held hostage. I
haven't finished reading it so I don't know the outcome, but he
doesn't paint a pretty picture.
Then again, he didn't in Debt of Honor either, and
that, sadly, essentially came true...
Let's Take A Lesson!
The Internet is clearly the "next utility."
We, as a society, had best now treat it, and protect it,
as the essential infrastructure that it is more-so-every-day
becoming. And we'd
best start now -- before we're one day surprised when the bits,
and the essential commerce they increasingly represent, don't go
through...
Back to Table
of Contents
Your Feedback is Important!
I'd like to understand your interest in The Harrow
Technology Report, how you make use of it, and the value you
feel it provides to you, your career, and to your company.
Please send your comments to me at Jeff@TheHarrowGroup.com
.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Jeff Harrow
If you've been following my musings for a while, you might
recall that to my enormous surprise, Sony's Aibo pet robotic dog
captured my heart at COMDEX last year (http://www.compaq.com/rcfoc/20001127.html#_Toc499300003).
It was truly amazing how, even in that noisy and crowded
environment, this hunk of metal, plastic, and silicon elicited
emotions similar to those of a real pet.
I'm sure there's a psychology PhD dissertation just waiting
to come out of this phenomenon, but it isn't really something to
get too excited about -- is it?
After all, Aibo is just a very expensive "toy."
Isn't it?
It turns out though, brought to our attention by reader Dana
Hoggatt, that Sony has plans for Aibo's base technology that
goes far, far beyond mere toys.
Consider, if you will, an Aibo-like car that interacts
with us on an emotional level!
Strange as that might sound, Sony and Toyota are
demonstrating the "Pod," a concept car whose
"user interface" applies Aibo's "emotion
engine" to make our driving experience a little better, and
a bit safer.
Aibo On Wheels?
According to the Oct. 24 PCWorld.com (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/
0,aid,67643,tk,dn102401X,00.asp), the Pod learns
about how we drive; what we like and dislike in the way of
music; perhaps our favorite climate control settings, and the
like -- it develops our profile.
And Pod then attempts to craft our perfect driving
environment before we even have to ask for it!
Pod can also monitor our physiology for signs of fatigue
(head-nod, eye-blink, etc.), and startle us back to wakefulness
so that we can pull off the road before we fall asleep at the
wheel. It can also
begin to understand our driving habits, and can compare them to
an "expert driver's" profile, gently chiding us to
become a safer driver. (Although I'm not sure I like that "Big Brother,"
or is it "Big Rover," element...)
Of course, not all of our likes and dislikes would be
apparent from just the time we spend in the car, so Pod comes
with a "Mini Me" version, called "Mini
Pod," that we would carry with us like a key chain.
Mini Pod would engage in constant learning about us, such
as what entertainment we like, perhaps what we buy
electronically, and it can act as a keyless entry to our car.
Then once back behind the wheel, Mini Pod will integrate
what it's learned into the car's profiles.
Pod also listens. Suppose
that you and your companion are chatting about Enya.
The sound system might gently bring up the haunting
strains of "Only Time" from a CD, or through its
wireless Internet connection (http://www.enya.com/enya.html).
Looking Forward...
Extrapolating a bit, if Pod has noticed that you like Thai
food based on your credit card activity, then using its GPS
system, a restaurant database, the time of day, and knowledge it
may have of if you've eaten lunch or dinner already (from, say
your PDA, or from an analysis of how long you've been in the
car, or perhaps from a non-invasive laser-based through-the-skin
measurement of your blood sugar level), it might suggest that
you're about to pass a 4-star candidate in the next five minutes
and offer to see if a table is available!
(And perhaps the restaurant's computer will offer you a
discount through Pod, to entice you in?)
Assuming that we can customize Pod's services (which means
"turn off" those we don't like), this could be very
interesting. But --
Sony may be going a bit too far.
You see, the Pod car, like Aibo, has a controllable tail
that like a real dog's tail, signals the car's (or its driver's)
emotions! Can you
see your car wagging a "thank you" to a driver that
lets you into traffic! (Or,
imagine what such as car might do to a driver that cuts you
off...)
Clearly, Pod is an early prototype, and many of its ideas may
prove impractical or annoying as testing goes on.
But I believe this is a fascinating example of how
innovative and forward-looking companies will increasingly be
taking ideas that prove effective in one venue (such as the toy
Aibo's ability to bond with people), and extend them into other,
perhaps "improbable" directions.
I don't know that I want my car's tail to wag. And I do harbor some concerns about "smart cars"
and other "smart appliances" (such as "toll
tags" and position-aware cell phones) being called to
testify against us in traffic or in accident cases.
But I can certainly envision a car that interacts with me
in a way that makes me feel "at home," and so easing a
long commute. And
who knows -- a car that can detect and perhaps defuse the
emotions leading up to "road rage," just might make
rush hour safer as well! On
the other hand, a lone programmer has just broken the encryption
and hacked into Aibo's proprietary programming environment, to
Sony's chagrin (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-
7746625.html?tag=dd.ne.dht.nl-hed.0).
Imagine what might happen if rogue programmers
target our future cars, as well...
It's simultaneously wondrous and frustrating, how often I
publish the "latest word" on a technology, only to
read the next morning that it's been superseded.
Which is now the case with the future of rewritable DVDs
that we discussed last issue (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20011022/20011022.htm#_Toc528139081).
Brought to our attention by reader Sander Olson, the Oct. 18
EE Times (http://www.eet.com/story/OEG20011018S0107)
describes how Matsushita has announced a new,
backwards-compatible version of DVD technology that can rewrite
-- not the 4.7 gigabytes that is common today -- but 100
gigabytes on a single dual-layer, dual-sided disk!
(They use new violet lasers which have a shorter
wavelength than the ones in use today; that allows them to focus
on smaller "spots," and so pack significantly more
data onto a same-sized disk.)
Wouldn't 100 gigabyte disks be a nicely-sized backup
medium for today's tens-of-gigabytes hard disks?
There's another element of Matsushita's new DVD technology
that would help the backup process.
Last night, my PC's backup program (Retrospect) backed up
16 gigabytes of data from my hard disk to my tape drive at the
respectable speed of 60 megabytes/minute.
The problem is that since the backup program has to first
write the data, and then go back and do another pass on the tape
to verify that the data on the tape actually matches the data on
the disk (that's the all-important "read-after-write
verification pass"), the entire process takes about 9
hours. As my disk
continues to fill up, not only will I need larger tapes (or an
automated tape changer), but the backups simply won't complete
overnight.
This new DVD technology, though, may be just what the data
doctor ordered. Matsushita
has demonstrated that their drive can record and play back data
at 248 megabytes/minute, or four times faster than my current
tape drive! At
essentially one gigabyte every four minutes, this new DVD
technology could theoretically (if the PC can feed it data fast
enough) back up and then verify my entire 16 gigabytes of data
in a mere two hours!
Much as I'd like to run out and buy one of these fast 100
gigabyte rewritable DVD drives today, they're a long way from
the store shelves. There
are compatibility issues with current DVDs, and intellectual
property issues that have yet to be resolved.
But the fact that this technology has now been
demonstrated, and the value that such large and fast rewritable
storage media would bring, make me confident that this or a
similar technology will find its way into our homes and offices.
(By the way, on the more expansive
issue of "data preservation" that we also discussed
last issue, reader Michael Bruce points out that there are
companies who offer solutions to this very issue.
One such company he brings to our attention is Kodak,
which offers an explanation of the problem at http://www.kodak.com/US/en/business/
digitalPreservation/index.shtml , including some
chilling examples. Such
as the corporate data of the Pennsylvania Railroad being
completely erased. Or
that 20% of the 1976 Viking Mars Mission data no longer being
readable...)
I just hope that these "bigger, faster" DVDs roll
out soon -- before our hard disks grow so much larger, again,
that a "mere" 100 gigabytes of backup capacity will
not be nearly enough...
·
DNA Dating? -- Responding to our recent discussion of how
music is being used to help us grasp the enormous complexity of
DNA and its associated proteins (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/
20010924/20010924.htm#_Toc525627014), reader J.D. Ray
suggests where this encoding of data into music might eventually
lead:
"I'm totally fascinated by
the musical interpretation of DNA and amino acid coding.
Someone here pointed out that, eventually, there will be
a machine that you can put a drop of your blood into, and it
will play your own personal song.
I remember reading about new silicon chips that act as
biological analyzers. Maybe
one day, the "what's your song?" functionality will be
a standard feature on MP3 players, and a fashionable new way to
meet people.
'Do our melodies medley well?
Let's go on a date...'"
It would sure beat the
stereotypical "What's your sign?"!
·
Excuse Me, Is That Your DNA Ringing? -- On the same
subject, Norway reader Knut Hansson describes how turning
individuals' DNA into music can solve a growing social problem:
"Here in Norway, the present
craze is to download ringing melodies (the sound you hear when
someone is calling) into your mobile phone...
A problem (apart from the many terrible sounds and
renderings of poor Mozart) is that many people use the same
sound. In public places, when a phone is ringing, many of us
grab for our phones.
It struck me that with a small
blood sample one could take out a part of the DNA - say the part
deciding your iris pattern or your thumbprint - and make an
absolutely guaranteed PERSONAL call sound. Now, that would be
something!"
Sounds like Knut may be on the
verge of a new business. And
what a good example, of how people are endlessly creative and
innovative!
Finally, this would be pretty humorous, if it wasn't so
serious to Web advertisers.
It seems, according to the Aug. 17 ZDNet News (http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5095848,00.html),
that a company called Gator (http://www.gator.com/)
has come up with a way to insert its own banner and pop-up ads
directly on top of, and obscuring, those carried on a Web site. Since they exactly match the size and position of the ads
they're covering, you might view a page and never know which
company actually sponsored the page!
"But wait," you might be saying, "that's a
neat technical trick, if perhaps a cutthroat business tactic,
but I have no plans to run out and purchase an application that
does this."
The thing is, this bit of programming tags along on some of
the free software that so many people enjoy downloading.
For example, you might download Gator's free password
manager program (which does clearly disclose this additional
functionality), and suddenly the ads you see are not what they
once were. (For
example, you might visit the Home Depot Web site, only to see
their competitor boldly advertising their own products on Home
Depot's page!)
There are, of course, two divergent schools of thought as to
whether this is legal, or ethical, or none of the above, and the
courts may get to weigh in on the final determination.
But this is also a great example of how one person's
idea, implemented on the Web "overnight," can change
all the rules!