LISTEN
To This Issue.
Quote
of the Week.
Where-away
Nanotech?
Wireless
Computing -- of a Very Different Kind.
A
Dye To Die For -- Data Preservation Thoughts...
From
Out of the Ether...
DO
Look A Gift Horse In The Mouth...
About
"The Harrow Technology Report"
Do you prefer to let your ears do the work of keeping you
in-touch with, and thinking about where technology is taking us?
If so, "The Harrow Technology Report" is
also available in an audio-on-demand, Web-based, MP3 version.
If you have an MP3 player on your system (and most do, such
as Window's Media Player, RealPlayer, etc.), clicking on the
link below will either stream the file to you, or, depending on
how your system is configured, it might download the file before
playing it. Alternatively,
if you specifically want to download the file, simply
right-click on the link, and choose "Save Target
As..."
So, if you wish, just click on the following link to listen
to this issue! www.TheHarrowGroup.com/articles/20011022/20011022.mp3
Back to Table of
Contents
The "Consumer Electronics Mentality," which I
believe applies across the board:
"It has to be easy, it has
to be fun, and most of all, it can't be boring."
by Steve Mollman,
Editor-in-Chief, J@pan Inc.
Sept. 9 Wired
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.09/docomo.html
(This is also an excellent article to help us understand why
Japan's iMode is so successful.)
Back to Table of
Contents
As we experience the early rumblings of nanotechnology and
molecular self-assembly, we might be tempted to shrug and say,
"What does this really mean to me?"
But now, based on an Oct. 17 disclosure from Bell Labs (http://www.bell-labs.com/news/2001/october/17/1.html)
brought to our attention by reader Sander Olson, the answer is
becoming clear: these
new technologies have created a transistor so small, that the
space between its electrodes (the "channel length") is
but one molecule long!!
Although still very much a prototype, Zhenan Bao, Hong Meng,
and Hendrik Schon have used molecular self-assembly techniques
to convince a transistor to form with features 100 times smaller
than those that we produce using today's most advanced
lithography techniques!
The distance between this transistor's electrodes is 100
times smaller than in today's smallest transistors -- about 1.3
nanometer, which is the size of a single molecule!
Compare that size of 1.3 nanometer, or .0013 micron, with
the size of today's newest commodity chip lithography process:
130 nanometers, or .13 micron - http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7570458.html?tag=dd.ne.dht.nl-sty.0
. Quite a
difference.
Another way to look at this is that the 42 million
transistors in today's Pentium 4 are still made using the
previous .18 micron, or 180 nanometer process.
That means that this new molecular-scale transistor
sports features 138-times closer together.
138-times smaller (hence faster)...
What this means, is that a molecular-scale transistor has now
demonstrated both the switching and the amplification
characteristics that make transistors so useful.
In fact, these scientists have brought two of these
molecular-scale transistors together into a functional
"voltage inverter" circuit! It boggles the mind -- a complete voltage inverter circuit
made out of two molecular-scale transistors!
Putting These Tiny Tinker Toys Together...
A great deal of the magic in this announcement is in how
these molecular-scale transistors are built.
Not by ever-more carefully etching away at layers on a
substrate, as we do today, but by convincing a layer of organic
molecules to self-assemble just where, and just how, they were
needed! In a
beaker. Without a
clean room. (This
process is explained a bit in the Oct. 18 New York Times - http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/18/science/18TRAN.html
).
Also, these molecular transistors are not made out of silicon
-- they're made out of carbon-based organic molecules.
The same class of molecules that make up -- us!
(Additional insights are at http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,47661,00.html?tw=wn20011018
.)
Looking Forward...
Of course, I do have to reign in my enthusiasm just a bit;
this is currently just a successful laboratory proof of concept.
But the inventors do see their "manufacturing
process" as being scaleable towards commercial yields.
Even at this early stage, this is still a very exciting
and real reminder that, Things Will Not Always Be The Same.
Will we one day grow our computers on-demand? Will the line between things that are clearly inanimate
(silicon-based circuits), and new things built of carbon-based
organic molecules (sound familiar?) become less clear?
Just remember how Bell Labs' first transistor invention,
back in 1947, changed our world.
Could they do it again?
Back to Table of
Contents
When most of us think of wireless computing, we see visions
of Internet-connected PDAs and notebooks and cell phones.
But an Israeli company, Given Imaging Ltd. (http://www.givenimaging.com/),
is taking these PC-driven technologies in another direction --
making it possible for us to contemplate our own navels, from
the inside!
Well, not our navels, exactly -- but this tiny high-tech pill
actually delivers pictures of our intestines as it takes its
journey from, er, input to output.
Not only is this a painless procedure, eschewing the
anesthesia and hospital visit that goes with a traditional
colonoscopy, but according to Given this mighty mite even
provides detailed diagnostic pictures from areas of the
intestines that can't normally be imaged.
Your doctor can prescribe this high tech "pill,"
and it will do its thing as you continue with your daily
activities. If you've ever gone through a traditional colonoscopy, you'll
appreciate just how significant a step forward this merging of
technology and medical science can be!
In this case, the patient wears a belt containing an
array of non-invasive sensors and antennas.
He or she then pops the pill, which contains a miniature
color video camera, lights, a battery, and a wireless
transmitter. During
the next few hours as the pill wafts its way through the
digestive system, it takes its digital snaps every few seconds
and wirelessly transmits them to the belt-mounted receiver and
storage unit. At
the same time, the antenna array maps the 3D progress of the
pill through the body, annotating the exact location of each
picture.
Once the pill has finished its day-long "Fantastic
Voyage," it's "naturally excreted" (and it's
disposable, so there's no need to try to recover it.)
Once the patient returns the belt-mounted equipment back
to the doctor's office, the data from the storage unit is
downloaded into a PC, where the images, along with a map showing
each image's position, are available to the physician as both a
series of still images and as a video clip.
Based on the information from Given, this technique opens up
a new world of comparatively inexpensive diagnostic procedures
that can help identify GI bleeding and other problems, far
earlier than before. Additional information is at http://www.givenimaging.com/ftp/FAQSaug5usa.pdf
.
This isn't "nanotechnology" -- at least not yet.
But it is a stunning example of how common, off-the-shelf
technology can be refined to do extraordinary things.
And this is only the beginning...
Don't Blink!
Back to Table
of Contents
Your Feedback is Important!
I'd like to understand your interest in The Harrow
Technology Report, how you make use of it, and the value you
feel it provides to you, your career, and to your company.
Please send your comments to me at Jeff@TheHarrowGroup.com
.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Jeff Harrow
Back to Table of
Contents
Or, Data Safety and CDs (and more), Revisited --
Several issues ago, we found that the seemingly ageless CD
that an increasing number of us use to backup critical data,
isn't, as we might have believed, quite as invulnerable as
Superman (http://www.compaq.com/rcfoc/
20010702.html#_Toc518206110).
While the unusual problem described in that story had to
do with a fungus consuming the reflective foil within a CD
(rendering it unreadable), reader Carl Taylor points us to an
excellent anatomy lesson on CD-Rs in the July 23
InformationWeek.com; it helps us to understand what makes a CD-R
tick, which makes it easier for us to better understand these
disks' strengths and weaknesses (http://www.informationweek.com/thisweek/
story/IWK20010719S0003?section=opinion).
To summarize, a common writable CD (CD-R) is primarily a solid
disk of clear plastic, usually polycarbonate, which has a spiral
"pre-groove" etched within it to act as a guide for
the laser. (These "pre-grooves" are the fine lines that act as
a diffraction grating, producing the rainbow colors you see
reflecting from a CD.)
Next comes a reflective layer, typically made of aluminum or
gold foil, which is glued to the plastic disk.
Then, a layer of organic dye covers the foil. Finally, a plastic or paper label goes over the foil (this is
the "top," or "back" side of the CD -- the
"business end" is the other, or clear side).
When you write to a CD-R, the reasonably strong "write
laser" melts tiny pits in the dye in just the right places
to represent your data. When
you later go to retrieve your data, the lower-powered
"read" laser can determine the difference between a
spot in the dye that had been zapped, and adjacent spots that
have not. This
allows the CD reader to recreate the ones and zeros of your
digital detritus.
From a longevity standpoint, the polycarbonate in a CD is pretty
strong - if you don't melt or scratch it too badly, it should
last for a long time. The
same goes for the sealed-in-plastic foil; especially if it's the
gold variety. But
that leaves the dye as "something to die for," from a
CD-R's perspective.
'Dem Dyes...
There are three common dyes in use today:
"Cyanine," the
blue-green dye used in many less-expensive CD-Rs, has a lifespan
of between 10 and 75 years, which puts it at the bottom of the
dye-lifetime scale. In a word, if you use these CD-Rs, be
"conservative" in how long you expect it to last.
"Phthalocyanine," on the other hand, is the
longest-lasting dye, producing golden-colored CD-R disks which
have, "...a reputed shelf life of something like 100
years."
Finally, with dye lifetimes falling between those two, we
first find the greenish-gold "fromazan" that
produces CD-Rs with a somewhat better lifetime than cyanine.
We also find the dark blue "metallized AZO" CD-Rs,
which exhibit a lifetime more towards the higher end of the
scale.
As we can see, the type of CD-R we buy can significantly
affect the longevity of our data -- but you may have noticed
that few CD-R packages disclose their chemistry!
So aside from the inexact art of eyeball color matching,
how can we tell what type of dye a given disk contains?
One answer comes to us from the Aug. 30 LangaList (http://www.langa.com/newsletters/2001/2001-08-30.htm#9),
which points us to a free utility from G&M called "CDR
Identifier" (http://www.gum.de/it/download/english.htm).
In many cases, this little program will read the
information block that is factory-written to the CD-R disk,
returning an indication if the CD-R is designed for short or
long term storage.
(CD-RW:
Although I haven't yet seen definitive figures for the
lifetime of CD-RW disks (those special disks that you can
RE-write up to 1,000 times), you might be interested in how they
work compared to a write-once CD-R.
Brought to our attention by the
Sept. 29 Stavance Newsflash, the "working layer" on a
CD-RW disk is made up of silver, indium antimony, tellurium, and
other rare earths, which have the ability to change from a
crystalline state (which reflects the laser as if no data were
written to a spot), into an amorphous state (which reads back
like a "pit" of data in a conventional CD).
The laser can "write" a spot using high power,
and then "erase" a previously-written spot (causing it
to return to the amorphous, or "no data" state) using
a medium power. Hence,
on CD-RW disks, we can write -- erase -- and write again and
again... http://www.scientificamerican.com/askexpert/computers/computers14/
)
Of course, nothing is exact in the data preservation game.
Any one CD, even with the most long-lived of dyes, might
suffer from a manufacturing problem or from a bad dye lot, and
the problem might not show up until long after your backup
software completes its full "verification pass" (you DO
configure your backup software to do a read-after-write
"verification pass," don't you?)
So be sure to keep your really critical data backed-up
onto multiple media, storing them at different sites!
(You can find more about CD-R and CD-RW CDs -- a LOT
more -- in Andy McFadden's excellent "CD-Recordable
FAQ" at http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq.html).
The Data Recovery Debacle...
But there's much more to consider about preserving your data,
regardless of the CD dye type, or any other media that you may
use. For example, do you have any old backup tapes that you made,
say, ten years ago? Or
do you have some old 5.25-inch or 8-inch floppies?
Assuming that their data is still viable (a poor
assumption after all these years), do you still have the tape or
disk drives that you need to actually read the media?
Do those old drives still work?
Do you still have the software drivers those old tape or
disk drives need to operate under your contemporary operating
system? If you haven't tested the recovery process recently, you
can't really be sure that the entire end-to-end recovery will
work...
Even if you CAN recover the data successfully, do you
still have that old word processor, or spreadsheet, or
proprietary application that you need to INTERPRET the
data once it's recovered from the backup media?
For these reasons, if you're serious about being able to
recover your data in the future, you might want to preserve a
PC, complete with the drives, operating system, drivers, and
applications, that you know will allow you to recover and read
your data when needed. And,
you might want to consider regenerating your critical data onto
new media, such as CD-R, as technologies continue to change.
It's poetic justice, perhaps, that paper (or stone tablets)
may still be the best backup media "for the ages..."
Too Small, Those CDs Are!
The 650 megabyte CD was once considered by some to be a
resource so large, that it would never be filled. Of course, that view of the storage world didn't last too
long, as text documents gave way to graphics, sound, and video,
and racks full of CDs sprouted up next to PCs.
Although there are some attempts to increase the capacity
of the CD by about two-times, this probably won't cut it since
hard drives are growing to hold hundreds of gigabytes, and HDTV
video makes even today's DVDs seem anemic.
The good news is that help is on the way in the form of
rewritable DVD drives; they work similarly to the rewritable CD
drives discussed above (although using different dyes).
The bad news, though, is that with a few exceptions that
have already hit the market, rewritable DVDs are not quite yet
ready for prime time -- unless we understand the ins and the
outs of the growing number of incompatible writable DVD formats.
Let's review this DVD alphabet soup:
The DVD ABCs...
Ah, for the 'good old days,' when a DVD (Digital Versatile
Disk) was a no-quiche DVD, without today's bewildering (often
incompatible) series of letters following its name, such as: DVD
Video (movie DVDs); DVD-ROM (read-only disks storing computer
files); write-once DVD-R and DVD+R; and the rewritable DVD-RW,
DVD-RAM, and DVD+RW formats.
Let's lay these evolving DVD secrets bare, based in part on
information in the Oct. 9 PCWorld.com (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,63404,pg,1,00.asp):
This all began with the "standard" DVD-ROM
drive, a device that reads data at the "DVD 1X" speed
of 1.38 megabytes/second, or faster (compared to a standard, or
"1X" CD drive that reads at 150 kilobytes/second).
There are millions of these drives installed today, which
can all read DVD Video disks and DVD-ROMs, as well as
"some" DVD writable formats. But that "some" is the compatibility kicker, as
we're about to see.
-
DVD-RAM is a standard for read/write DVDs backed by the
"DVD Forum" (http://www.dvdforum.com/forum.shtml),
which turns a DVD into a virtual hard disk as large as 4.7
gigabytes (this may double in the future).
This is often integrated into the computer's file system
so that files can be read and written just like any disk drive.
A DVD-RAM disk can be re-written about 100,000 times, and
it has a predicted lifetime of between 30 and 100 years (does
"backup" come to mind?)
Media costs about $17 for 4.7 gigabytes of storage.
But -- data transfer is currently limited to 1.4
megabytes/second, and a "verification pass" effectively
doubles the time it takes to write a file, which implies a long
time to back up a multi-gigabyte hard disk.
Also, most standard DVD movie players, and some older
DVD-ROM players, choke on trying to read video written to a
DVD-RAM disk (their lasers can't "see" the rewritable
dye). Additionally,
many DVD-RAM disks are housed in a special carrier, which adds
bulk compared to "naked" DVD disks.
-
DVD-R is another child of the "DVD Forum,"
which is a 4.7 gigabyte "write-once" format analogous
to CD-R, in that once you write a byte on the disk, it's there
to stay. This has
obvious benefits as a relatively secure (unchangeable) backup
medium, but its real strength lies in its compatibility -- many
DVD movie (TV) and DVD-ROM (computer) players can
"see" the dye in DVD-R disks.
-
DVD-RW is another rewritable format with a capacity of
4.7 gigabytes. It
has a write speed of 1.385 megabytes/second, and a disk can be
rewritten up to 1,000 times.
But -- many older DVD drives misidentify a DVD-RW disk as a
dual-layer DVD, and refuse to read it.
-
DVD+RW is the latest rewritable format, championed by the
"DVD+RW Alliance" (http://www.dvdrw.com/),
due to hit the shelves this fall in the guise of a new drive
from HP. It can
also read and write 4.7 gigabytes per disk, but it can write at
a faster 3.32 megabytes/second (2.4X), up of 1,000 times.
And this drive can also write CD-R and CD-RW disks.
A DVD+RW disk costs about $15.
But -- many older DVD Video and DVD-ROM drives (those produced
prior to 2000) have trouble identifying a DVD+RW disk; similar
to the compatibility issues with DVD-RW disks.
A partial solution to this issue may be forthcoming early
next year in the guise of the "DVD+R" format, a
write-once variation that should be more palatable to older
drives.
How long will these DVD disks last?
When you rush out to buy your very own copy of Shrek, it
will probably be readable for between 50 and 300 years.
DVD-R and DVD+R write-once disks are expected to have a
lifetime similar to CD-R disks, from 40 to 250 years.
And the re-writable DVDs should last between 25 and 100
years - http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#4.3.1
.
So -- whether you need these silvery platters for moving huge
amounts of data, or as a more realistically-sized backup media
for your constantly growing hard disks, it seems likely that
DVDs, of one format or another, are likely to send CDs chasing
after 8-track tapes down the halls of history.
Of course there's much more to understanding what makes DVDs
tick, and if this discussion has whet your appetite, check out
"DVD Demystified" at http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html
.
Data-Deadly Dumpsters.
Speaking of using these inexpensive silvery disks as storage
and backup media, it's worth remembering just how much of our
business and personal data can be easily left lying around, or
tossed into the trash, on outdated or partially recorded CDs and
DVDs. Reader John
Boufford reminds us to take care:
" We forget how much data is
stored on those $.50 disks, and that they are not the easiest
thing to break. (The
cases we store them in are easier to break than the disks!) The
best tools to use are a heavy duty scissors, or a pair of
gardening shears."
Besides -- cutting up old CDs or DVDs just might be good
therapy -- we can take out our frustrations while we have to
wait for our PC to reboot after its next crash!
Make Like An Elephant!
Preserving our data is a combination of art and science,
mixed with a large measure of "looking forward" to
assure that we can indeed "look back" when the need
arises. It's worth
thinking about this (and reviewing our backup policies every few
years) to make sure that, like the proverbial elephant, we won't
"forget" our stored data.
Because our governmental, and business, and personal
history -- would be a terrible thing to waste!
Back to Table of
Contents
Repurposing Expertise -- Commenting on our exploration
of how surgeons are now performing operations by reaching across
oceans (http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/20011008/
20011008.htm#_Toc526918751), reader Jim Watts
suggests that the data that passes between doctor and the
surgical robot at the far end could also be repurposed in a very
interesting way:
"I think the bigger
potential for this type of technology is training - imagine
being shown exactly what an expert would do in a given
situation."
Mix the data that defines all aspects of a successful
operation with simulation software, and any number of
docs-in-training could "learn from the master," as a
"3D video game" demonstrates exactly how the students'
attempts differed from the expert's.
Which could be a big help for doctor and patients
alike...
Back to Table of
Contents
Finally, it seems that in Taiwan, if you have something to
hide from your spouse or business partner, you might want to
look very carefully if you receive a cell phone as a gift.
According to an article that was once available on the
Straits Times web site (http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/asia/story/0,1870,59002,00.html?),
$1,800 will let your significant other (or your boss, or your
business competitor!) buy you a rather specialized cell phone. It's special, because they can later call the phone using a
special number -- and it won't ring.
Instead, it will silently answer and let the caller
eavesdrop on what's going on around you!
Ouch. The gift
-- that keeps on giving...?